is Question 4. You have a primary relationship
with your Person of Interest, and you want to
know how your Person of Interest feels about
another person.
Or you want to know how your Person of Interest
feels about the friends/family who are interfering.
Or you want to know how
your Person of Interest feels about the job
opportunity that will cause him to move away
from where you live.
It doesn't have to be love. Maybe you want to
know how the judge feels about their case;
how your child feels about the pusher;
how your neighbors are disposed toward your
zoning variance application;
how elderly parents are disposed toward
a ne'er-do-well relative who is
pressuring them to make a change in the Will.
Even how Baby likes the new crib,
or how kitty is adjusting to life in the new home,
or how son is adjusting to life in college . . . is he sober???
- or How your child really feels about the other
custodial parent.
Is your pet missing? This answer will look
through the eyes of the animal and tell you how
she or she experiences the enviromment and the
people around him/her.
So Question 4 is a flexible useful tool. You get
into the mind, heart, gut and soul – into the
inner thoughts – of your Person of Interest
regarding the problem person, regarding the
problem thing . . . regarding the interfering
factor in your life.
The minds of persons unknown to you can also
be accessed in this Question 4. We can ask the
motive of culprit/perpetrator. We can ask the
unknown thief why he/she stole (it), and the
answer, which is in that person's words, usually
expresses that guilty party's personality. We can
ask the deceased victim's view of what happened
to him or her (or it). Then we can ask the
unknown mugger or murderer what he/she did
or what happened. This process has been
extremely accurate in the hands of Emily.
Sunday, August 9, 2009
Her View Of Him
-----------HER VIEW OF HIM
is Question 5, and is Question 2 of the second series,
the one about relationships between and among others.
Now we are looking into the friend of a friend,
what that person's perspective is about
- and what that person feels about -
your Person of Interest.
This answer enriches your knowing
the dynamics of their relationship,
your knowing why he acts the way he does,
and, uh, 'what she sees in him.'
More often than you would think,
the Other Woman is dallying with your Dude,
and he is just escaping the pressures
of an intense relationship with you, his primary.
Getting upset is a waste of time.
The relationship we find the dynamics of
does not have to involve
someone you know or are interested in.
It could be 'What is going on between the boss
and that mysterious visitor or his/her assistant.'
It could be about neighbors or relatives.
It could even be an investigation.
Sometimes, just being nosy.
The View questions don't have to stop at this point.
Emily can go on down the line –
which can be useful in group dynamics,
like when you want to know about
a gang or a passel of coworkers
or the members of the manpack your guy hangs out with.
Want to know how she feels about her husband,
and her husband feels not only about her,
but about his girlfriend, his mother and his pastor?
Not a problem.
His View of Her and Her View of Him are twin inquiries.
You get similar information when you ask
'the dynamics of their relationship'
but you get more psychology with the twin questions.
You can ask both ways, of course.
is Question 5, and is Question 2 of the second series,
the one about relationships between and among others.
Now we are looking into the friend of a friend,
what that person's perspective is about
- and what that person feels about -
your Person of Interest.
This answer enriches your knowing
the dynamics of their relationship,
your knowing why he acts the way he does,
and, uh, 'what she sees in him.'
More often than you would think,
the Other Woman is dallying with your Dude,
and he is just escaping the pressures
of an intense relationship with you, his primary.
Getting upset is a waste of time.
The relationship we find the dynamics of
does not have to involve
someone you know or are interested in.
It could be 'What is going on between the boss
and that mysterious visitor or his/her assistant.'
It could be about neighbors or relatives.
It could even be an investigation.
Sometimes, just being nosy.
The View questions don't have to stop at this point.
Emily can go on down the line –
which can be useful in group dynamics,
like when you want to know about
a gang or a passel of coworkers
or the members of the manpack your guy hangs out with.
Want to know how she feels about her husband,
and her husband feels not only about her,
but about his girlfriend, his mother and his pastor?
Not a problem.
His View of Her and Her View of Him are twin inquiries.
You get similar information when you ask
'the dynamics of their relationship'
but you get more psychology with the twin questions.
You can ask both ways, of course.
What Will Happen Between Them
is Question 6, the last of the series.
You want to know events regarding any two persons.
The full question is “What will happen between them
in 3 months?” or whatever time you choose.
Stating the time is advisable but not necessary.
A 100% accurate psychic reading that will not happen
for 20 years ends up being not accurate. (This actually happened to me.)
Sometimes you want to know whether a certain thing
will happen in a certain time
instead of what will happen.
“Will they divorce by the end of the year?” is a good example.
In job interview inquiries,
or when you want to know
what is happening among members
of a group of people
(family, workers, friends, community, political body, etc.),
this question efficiently outlines the action.
If a squabble or a feud is afoot,
this question cuts to the chase and saves time.
You want to know events regarding any two persons.
The full question is “What will happen between them
in 3 months?” or whatever time you choose.
Stating the time is advisable but not necessary.
A 100% accurate psychic reading that will not happen
for 20 years ends up being not accurate. (This actually happened to me.)
Sometimes you want to know whether a certain thing
will happen in a certain time
instead of what will happen.
“Will they divorce by the end of the year?” is a good example.
In job interview inquiries,
or when you want to know
what is happening among members
of a group of people
(family, workers, friends, community, political body, etc.),
this question efficiently outlines the action.
If a squabble or a feud is afoot,
this question cuts to the chase and saves time.
How Tarot Analysis Supports The Path:
ABOUT SPIRITUAL GROWTH or personal development:
HOW TAROT ANALYSIS SUPPORTS THE PATH:
It is an act of will – a decision, that's all – that starts a person on the mystic path of being one with the Almighty. After that initiation, it is events of the person's life, and the “voice in your gut” that are the training, the lessons. Seeing a pattern in the events of your life is seeing your path. The focus of your path is what you do, not what you believe: God wants you to think or believe in whatever motivates you ahead in your growth. (It's not the dogma, it's the doing.) Ignored lessons recur in ever harsher more obvious forms!
The most valuable and delectable parts of a human, from God's point of view, are the dark parts: the petty self-interest, the “looking out for Number One.” Self-interest limits you and gums up the works in God's cosmos. Transmuting the self-interest is enlightenment, is a victory for light over darkness to you; and to God it is His cleaner house. As time and events go by, you become less focused on your physical life and are more “out there” in your perspective.
A lot of your work as one of God's people is done in the nonphysical realms in your sleep. At some point you are trained – by the events of your life - to accomplish and support events God wills, sometimes by channeling them. You get to keep some of the talents you develop in the endeavor of supporting or accomplishing the events God wills. Psychic insight is often one of those abilities you keep.
Gradually your will (your willpower) is becoming God's will as you and God become one; and God's will is almighty . . . because He has His finger on the triggers of coincidence . . . so you gradually become able to make things happen. You create events nonphysically. This is the great spiritual truth and is The Great Work, the Mystery. Being one with God and giving up the petty part of your individuality is . . .duh . . . a net gain.
The analysis of the events of your life in your tarot session with Emily clarifies what is REALLY at issue in your life, clarifies what your next step in Spiritual Growth or Personal Development is. And when the issues are clarified, you waste less time on what is not-so-important. We humans have only so much time, so we go much farther with clear light on our path one step at a time. The next step up is all you need to know. The rest is dogma.
HOW TAROT ANALYSIS SUPPORTS THE PATH:
It is an act of will – a decision, that's all – that starts a person on the mystic path of being one with the Almighty. After that initiation, it is events of the person's life, and the “voice in your gut” that are the training, the lessons. Seeing a pattern in the events of your life is seeing your path. The focus of your path is what you do, not what you believe: God wants you to think or believe in whatever motivates you ahead in your growth. (It's not the dogma, it's the doing.) Ignored lessons recur in ever harsher more obvious forms!
The most valuable and delectable parts of a human, from God's point of view, are the dark parts: the petty self-interest, the “looking out for Number One.” Self-interest limits you and gums up the works in God's cosmos. Transmuting the self-interest is enlightenment, is a victory for light over darkness to you; and to God it is His cleaner house. As time and events go by, you become less focused on your physical life and are more “out there” in your perspective.
A lot of your work as one of God's people is done in the nonphysical realms in your sleep. At some point you are trained – by the events of your life - to accomplish and support events God wills, sometimes by channeling them. You get to keep some of the talents you develop in the endeavor of supporting or accomplishing the events God wills. Psychic insight is often one of those abilities you keep.
Gradually your will (your willpower) is becoming God's will as you and God become one; and God's will is almighty . . . because He has His finger on the triggers of coincidence . . . so you gradually become able to make things happen. You create events nonphysically. This is the great spiritual truth and is The Great Work, the Mystery. Being one with God and giving up the petty part of your individuality is . . .duh . . . a net gain.
The analysis of the events of your life in your tarot session with Emily clarifies what is REALLY at issue in your life, clarifies what your next step in Spiritual Growth or Personal Development is. And when the issues are clarified, you waste less time on what is not-so-important. We humans have only so much time, so we go much farther with clear light on our path one step at a time. The next step up is all you need to know. The rest is dogma.
Sea Sickness Of The Mind
Seasickness hits you when your body tells your brain one thing, and your eyes tell it another, about how you are oriented in space relative to the horizon. There is another kind of seasickness that is psychological. It distorts reality in a similar fashion, and it too makes us sick. It is subtle but not entirely below conscious awareness: We can catch ourselves at it. It happens ya never know when. It gets you when the mood does not match the moment.
I discovered this distortion of reality in action one day when I found tears on my cheeks on a day when I was really, really happy, and everything was going swell. “Okay, what's up?” I asked myself. I tuned in to this experience.
What I discovered – ta-da! – is this: While “I” was so very happy, my body was not; it was deeply sad. At that moment, I could have attached that sad feeling to something going on around me, could have concluded my job was depressing. I knew my body chemistry was out of whack at the time: the doctor told me my estrogen level was 800 times normal and other hormones were in balance at that level. Is it that knowledge that led me to delve into the experience?
It hit me then and has never left me: That our mind goes around assuming life makes sense at any given moment, assumes that our feelings arise from what is going on at that given moment. (Well, that is usually true for most of us.) We assume life makes sense this way, so when our body chemistry creates an inappropriate mood or feeling, we twist our minds and change our opinions to match or attach the feeling to whatever is happening at the time. Believing that reality makes sense is one cause of mental illness?
It is as if we had a pocketful of labels in our “feeling bin.” Painting that 'depressing' label on the job would prompt my mind – as time went on and as other things happened - to invent ways the job was depressing to validate the label the initial experience painted on there. A snowball effect, a cascade of assumptions and conclusions, would have occurred. I would be more miserable at work than warranted. The label is like a color filter on a camera: everything looks rosy or blue or scary.
At least some of the people who are hostile unreasonably had angry body chemistry sometime ago, and attached the 'angry' label to everything some time ago, and lost focus. They are stuck on angry. Some people are stuck on stupid and feel inadequate inappropriately. Some people are stuck on feeling secure and are inappropriately trusting. COULD I JUST PLEASE GET STUCK ON BEING SENSIBLE?????
Another example of this pernicious process is “I am not good at that, I can't do that.” Of course, sometimes it is “I am so good at that” because it was a good day when I first tried. Let's say I am doing a particular thing . . . cutting up vegetables . . . and my psyche is irritated. I conclude that I hate cutting up vegetables. After that, I am annoyed when I 'have to' make a salad. Let's say I am feeling disagreeable because my tummy is upset, and it's raining outside. I conclude rain is a bad thing. Really? Let's say I am angry and a certain person walks in. I must not like that person. Really? Let's say my brain has bathed my endocrine system with nesting urges, and I fall in love with the next warm body I encounter? Really?????!!!!!
Losing the labels (or the colored filters) is a challenge: Most of our conclusions are valid. You have to catch yourself in the act of slapping one of those labels inappropriately on an experience. And you have to question how you really feel about . . . whatever . . . and why. Is that what 'living in the moment' is about?
Oh, how liberating it is to unravel these inappropriate conclusions. It is like losing a bad religion, like recovering from a disease. Now we realize we like a color that we thought we didn't like because, when we were a kid . . . .
I discovered this distortion of reality in action one day when I found tears on my cheeks on a day when I was really, really happy, and everything was going swell. “Okay, what's up?” I asked myself. I tuned in to this experience.
What I discovered – ta-da! – is this: While “I” was so very happy, my body was not; it was deeply sad. At that moment, I could have attached that sad feeling to something going on around me, could have concluded my job was depressing. I knew my body chemistry was out of whack at the time: the doctor told me my estrogen level was 800 times normal and other hormones were in balance at that level. Is it that knowledge that led me to delve into the experience?
It hit me then and has never left me: That our mind goes around assuming life makes sense at any given moment, assumes that our feelings arise from what is going on at that given moment. (Well, that is usually true for most of us.) We assume life makes sense this way, so when our body chemistry creates an inappropriate mood or feeling, we twist our minds and change our opinions to match or attach the feeling to whatever is happening at the time. Believing that reality makes sense is one cause of mental illness?
It is as if we had a pocketful of labels in our “feeling bin.” Painting that 'depressing' label on the job would prompt my mind – as time went on and as other things happened - to invent ways the job was depressing to validate the label the initial experience painted on there. A snowball effect, a cascade of assumptions and conclusions, would have occurred. I would be more miserable at work than warranted. The label is like a color filter on a camera: everything looks rosy or blue or scary.
At least some of the people who are hostile unreasonably had angry body chemistry sometime ago, and attached the 'angry' label to everything some time ago, and lost focus. They are stuck on angry. Some people are stuck on stupid and feel inadequate inappropriately. Some people are stuck on feeling secure and are inappropriately trusting. COULD I JUST PLEASE GET STUCK ON BEING SENSIBLE?????
Another example of this pernicious process is “I am not good at that, I can't do that.” Of course, sometimes it is “I am so good at that” because it was a good day when I first tried. Let's say I am doing a particular thing . . . cutting up vegetables . . . and my psyche is irritated. I conclude that I hate cutting up vegetables. After that, I am annoyed when I 'have to' make a salad. Let's say I am feeling disagreeable because my tummy is upset, and it's raining outside. I conclude rain is a bad thing. Really? Let's say I am angry and a certain person walks in. I must not like that person. Really? Let's say my brain has bathed my endocrine system with nesting urges, and I fall in love with the next warm body I encounter? Really?????!!!!!
Losing the labels (or the colored filters) is a challenge: Most of our conclusions are valid. You have to catch yourself in the act of slapping one of those labels inappropriately on an experience. And you have to question how you really feel about . . . whatever . . . and why. Is that what 'living in the moment' is about?
Oh, how liberating it is to unravel these inappropriate conclusions. It is like losing a bad religion, like recovering from a disease. Now we realize we like a color that we thought we didn't like because, when we were a kid . . . .
Open Face Vegetarian Chili Orgy
Oil warms in a large fry pan, getting acquainted with half a head of jumbo garlic that left the food processor finely honed. A bunch of green onions (white and green, whole body) are getting chopped while the other ingredients get together in that pan, and the onions soon join in the warm oil simmer. So do some jalapeno slices from a bottle, if you like those guys. When the onions are a darker shade of green, it is time to call the chili in from the can: Nally's vegetarian with soy! Fewer calories, same taste.
While the chili is settling in, pepper jack cheese (almost an inch of 4-inch square brick) is sliced thinly enough, and then the slices are put in a bundle and cut all the way through – cut to the depth of the stuff in the pan - so they make thin squares you pull apart and put into the chili upright, not flat – standing up, not lying down. This will thicken the sauce. While the cheese is slowly melting into the community, drain a can of stewed tomatoes (Drink that good juice!) and put the big chunks of cooked tomato on top.
Let them all be for a while. They will create a little too much water. By now the cheese is melted, so you can stir everybody together. Put two big slices of whole grain bread – preferably the kind with chunks of grain in the slice – into the mix. Spoon the chili on top of the bread.
Serves two or three very happy people.
While the chili is settling in, pepper jack cheese (almost an inch of 4-inch square brick) is sliced thinly enough, and then the slices are put in a bundle and cut all the way through – cut to the depth of the stuff in the pan - so they make thin squares you pull apart and put into the chili upright, not flat – standing up, not lying down. This will thicken the sauce. While the cheese is slowly melting into the community, drain a can of stewed tomatoes (Drink that good juice!) and put the big chunks of cooked tomato on top.
Let them all be for a while. They will create a little too much water. By now the cheese is melted, so you can stir everybody together. Put two big slices of whole grain bread – preferably the kind with chunks of grain in the slice – into the mix. Spoon the chili on top of the bread.
Serves two or three very happy people.
The Party (a poem)
the king at the party was shy as usual,
the nobles came to believe he was snobbish.
a peasant from out of town crashed the party,
and, ignorant, became the king's best buddy.
she was just sitting there unleashed and open.
His Honor dropped by for a casual chat.
a word from him and he universe sputtered:
How was a foreigner to know all that?
the nobles came to believe he was snobbish.
a peasant from out of town crashed the party,
and, ignorant, became the king's best buddy.
she was just sitting there unleashed and open.
His Honor dropped by for a casual chat.
a word from him and he universe sputtered:
How was a foreigner to know all that?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)